Evolutionary Thoughts

Give me feedback an these questions please.


Consider for a moment that evolution is true, and answer this question from a evolutionist point of view: If human DNA is 70% the same as that of a banana, and even closer to that of a pig, why is it that we are all descendants of apes? Why aren’t some of us descendants of bananas or pigs? Or is it just that evolution is all a lie, and a device used to try to remove God from the picture?



Now answer me this question: if the sun grows by 11 feet every day, and if the earth is in fact billions and billions of years old, why wasn’t the earth engulfed in the sun years ago? Or is it that the earth really is not that old, and modern scientists’ dating methods are inaccurate and/or dishonest?



Why would evolutionists claim that the earth came into being through said “Big Bang” if the chances of a livable world coming into being by chance are no greater than the chances of the unabridged dictionary coming out of a printing factory explosion? In fact, taking into account the necessary gravitational forces of the planet, the necessary distance of the moon from the planet (yes, a moon is required for a livable planet), and the necessary amount of fresh, moving water, the chances of a livable planet coming out of a random explosion are so slim, that there are not enough stars in the universe for there to be a reasonable chance that one of them contains a earth-like planet. Why, then do evolutionists cling to this rather improbable idea if not only to avoid including a sovereign God?



Why is it that evolutionists argue in favor of a multi-billion year old earth if they if, in arguing thus, would also have to argue in favor of the oceans being giant bricks of salt? It is a generally know fact that year by year the oceans gather more and more salt. This being said, at the rate at which the salt is gathering, it would necessarily follow the conclusion of an ancient earth that its oceans would be bricks of salt!